Problem 1 asks to show that if three numbers are given, each a power of 2 or of 3, or a product of powers of 2 and 3, then either one of these three numbers is a square, or else the product of some of them is a square.

Each of these numbers, and their products, can be written in the form with A number of this form is a square if and only if both and are even.

To a number we associate its “pattern of parities,” the pair Note that if has pattern and has pattern then their product has pattern

If one of the three numbers has pattern we are done. If two of the numbers have the same pattern, their product is a square, and we are done. So we may assume that the numbers have patterns and But then the product of the three of them is a square.

More generally, one can check that if positive integers are given (), and their prime factorizations together involve only primes, then there is a (non-empty) subset of these integers whose product is a square. Try to show this as an extra credit problem.

Problem 2 asks to show that if 9 lattice points are given in there are two such that the midpoint of the segment they determine is also a lattice point. Here, a lattice point is a point all of whose coordinates are integers.

As before, associate to each lattice point its pattern of parity, Note that the midpoint of the segment joining and is It follows that this midpoint is a lattice point iff and have the same pattern of parity.

But there are only 8 possible patterns: each of the three coordinates is either 0 or 1. Since 9 points are given, two must have the same pattern, and we are done.

Problem 3 asks for a list of 4 distinct integers without an increasing or decreasing subsequence of length 3.

There are many possible ways of doing this. For example,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 13th, 2010 at 10:59 am and is filed under 187: Discrete mathematics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Georgii: Let me start with some brief remarks. In a series of three papers: a. Wacław Sierpiński, "Contribution à la théorie des séries divergentes", Comp. Rend. Soc. Sci. Varsovie 3 (1910) 89–93 (in Polish). b. Wacław Sierpiński, "Remarque sur la théorème de Riemann relatif aux séries semi-convergentes", Prac. Mat. Fiz. XXI (1910) 17–20 […]

It is not possible to provide an explicit expression for a non-linear solution. The reason is that (it is a folklore result that) an additive $f:{\mathbb R}\to{\mathbb R}$ is linear iff it is measurable. (This result can be found in a variety of places, it is a standard exercise in measure theory books. As of this writing, there is a short proof here (Intern […]

Stefan, "low" cardinalities do not change by passing from $L({\mathbb R})$ to $L({\mathbb R})[{\mathcal U}]$, so the answer to the second question is that the existence of a nonprincipal ultrafilter does not imply the existence of a Vitali set. More precisely: Assume determinacy in $L({\mathbb R})$. Then $2^\omega/E_0$ is a successor cardinal to ${ […]

Marginalia to a theorem of Silver (see also this link) by Keith I. Devlin and R. B. Jensen, 1975. A humble title and yet, undoubtedly, one of the most important papers of all time in set theory.

Given a positive integer $a$, the Ramsey number $R(a)$ is the least $n$ such that whenever the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ are colored using only two colors, we necessarily have a copy of $K_a$ with all its edges of the same color. For example, $R(3)= 6$, which is usually stated by saying that in a party of 6 people, necessarily there are 3 that know e […]

Equality is part of the background (first-order) logic, so it is included, but there is no need to mention it. The situation is the same in many other theories. If you want to work in a language without equality, on the other hand, then this is mentioned explicitly. It is true that from extensionality (and logical axioms), one can prove that two sets are equ […]

$L$ has such a nice canonical structure that one can use it to define a global well-ordering. That is, there is a formula $\phi(u,v)$ that (provably in $\mathsf{ZF}$) well-orders all of $L$, so that its restriction to any specific set $A$ in $L$ is a set well-ordering of $A$. The well-ordering $\varphi$ you are asking about can be obtained as the restriction […]

Gödel sentences are by construction $\Pi^0_1$ statements, that is, they have the form "for all $n$ ...", where ... is a recursive statement (think "a statement that a computer can decide"). For instance, the typical Gödel sentence for a system $T$ coming from the second incompleteness theorem says that "for all $n$ that code a proof […]

When I first saw the question, I remembered there was a proof on MO using Ramsey theory, but couldn't remember how the argument went, so I came up with the following, that I first posted as a comment: A cute proof using Schur's theorem: Fix $a$ in your semigroup $S$, and color $n$ and $m$ with the same color whenever $a^n=a^m$. By Schur's theo […]

It depends on what you are doing. I assume by lower level you really mean high level, or general, or 2-digit class. In that case, 54 is general topology, 26 is real functions, 03 is mathematical logic and foundations. "Point-set topology" most likely refers to the stuff in 54, or to the theory of Baire functions, as in 26A21, or to descriptive set […]